What kind of organization is invisible children

No person, community, or ecosystem exists in isolation, which means we need each other, and we need to learn from each other. It also means the safety and wellbeing of people are inextricably linked to the safety and wellbeing of our natural world. Growth Mindset We are constantly evaluating, listening, correcting, and innovating. We do not fail when we change course. Growth is an indicator of health and aliveness. We fail when we are unwilling to change.

Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form , or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible. This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts.

This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on W In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations.

Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting. Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public b 1 A vi BMF foundation code: Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary i.

BMF affiliation code: 3. The Form is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to view this organization's Forms on the IRS website if any are available.

This score estimates the actual impact a nonprofit has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.

Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization. Do you work at Invisible Children? OVER T Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that the organization has not yet submitted data for evaluation. This score provides an assessment of the organization's engagement with the constituents it serves, a practice we term Constituent Feedback.

When organizations listen to constituents, they are able to better deliver on programs and meet the needs of stakeholders. A future version of this Beacon will also assess an organization's people operations and its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion DEI metrics. Nonprofit organizations are encouraged to fill out the How We Listen section of their Candid profile.

Constituent Feedback and Listening Practice data are not available for this organization. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations that engage in inclusive practices, such as collecting feedback from the people and communities they serve, may be more effective. We award every nonprofit that completes the Candid survey full credit for this Beacon, in recognition of their willingness to publicly share this information with the nonprofit and philanthropic communities.

Although the data is not evaluated for quality at this time, future iterations of this Beacon will include third party or other data that will serve to validate the information provided by the nonprofit. Our partnership with Feedback Labs and Guidestar by Candid , and other partners including Fund for Shared Insight, GlobalGiving, and Keystone Accountability, enables us to launch the first version of this beacon with Constituent Feedback information collected on Candid's site.

Feedback practices have been shown to support better Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion outcomes, an essential area of assessment that we intend to further expand and develop in the future. Feedback Labs has documented several studies which indicate that beyond achieving organizational goals, nonprofits that are attentive and responsive to concerns and ideas raised by beneficiaries establish stronger relationships with the people they serve, promote greater equity, and empower constituents in ways that can help to ensure better long-term outcomes.

You can find resources to help nonprofits improve their feedback practices here. The Giving Basket had an issue with your donation. Please try again. If the problem persists contact us and include your Cart ID: Unknown.

Invisible Children. Box Washington DC You are viewing this organization's new Charity Navigator profile page. To view the legacy version, click here. Star Rated Report. Financial Performance Metrics. Fundraising Expenses. Fundraising Efficiency. Working Capital Ratio. Program Expense Growth. Liabilities to Assets. Program Expense. Program Expense Ratio Administrative Expenses Fundraising Expenses 1.

Liabilities to Assets Ratio Working Capital Ratio 0. Program Expense Growth However, I did want to research this campaign and the reasons behind it on my own. After researching IC, I realized that their organization was in some ways helping the people in Uganda.

However their is still much room for improvement with this organization. For example only around 37 percent of their finances go to helping rehabilitate and protect the children that the LRA would take.

This is a number that could AND should be drastically increased. I'm not saying to not donate to this charity, but do some research and carefully consider before you do. I was pretty late in learning about IC, and I suppose that is a good thing. First off, I do believe that IC is a noble cause in what it is ultimately trying to achieve.

According to charitynavigator. The rest goes to staff and management. However, just because it caught our attention for a bit does not make it ok for their finances to be split in such a way that does not make much of a difference to their cause. Lauren K. In the Kony video, Invisible Children claims that in order to keep the US advisors in Uganda Invisible Children and its supporting members need to raise awareness about the atrocities of Joseph Kony and his army. To raise this awareness, they would wear the t-shirts and put up the posters that came in the action kits.

I will not support Invisible Children, but anyone interested should do their own research and decide to support or not support Invisible Children based on that research. After being initially drawn by the emotional appeal of the Kony video, I did a considerable amount of research.

The organization claims by sending a few dollars and purchasing the Action Kit somehow the Ugandan warlord will be captured. My first experience with this organization was watching Kony After seeing the brokenness left by Kony, this film had me sold. The mission of Invisible Children directly fits with my heartbeat for humanity in undeveloped countries. It encouraged me to intensify my desires and make them actions. I went home eager to share about the charity with friends. Instead, I was shocked to see so much controversy surrounding this organization-- criticisms about their leaders, purpose, and impact.

This confusion left me to explore Invisible Children for myself. After months of researching their website, the form , and other sources, I found that the majority of claims are simply slander based on wrong assumptions, impossible to prove by evidence.

Now I am seriously considering supporting Invisible Children and encourage others to do the same. The political unrest can then be linked back to suffering people and an unstable government. Solve the other problems first like AIDS and hunger, by donating to organizations that focus on such causes- like Compassion International and World Vision.

Once the media began saying how crooked the company was, I felt very betrayed. When Invisible Children came out with their new video, it brought back all those strong feelings I had. I decided to do some thorough research on their finances.

In my research I found that, for the most part, Invisible Children have a slightly lower than average financial standing.

They are definitely not the monster that everybody makes them out to be. They are a newer company though, so it is only natural that they put a lot of money into advertising. After having done this research, I feel somewhat renewed in my initial vigor to help Invisible Children. I am more than likely going to donate to this organization.

I was judging them based entirely on the video, and personally find their method of getting Kony famous absurd. But the video worked and achieved its target of making Kony famous. This popularity made me curious and I started doing my research on IC. This lead me to realize that my personal opinion was heavily influenced by all the negative comments on YouTube. I found out that there are still children suffering because of Kony. The video was speaking the truth and it brought the crime of Kony to the whole world.

I might not agree with their method but ultimately, I will still donate to help them. Over the past few months I have done a decent amount of research on Invisible Children. I have come to the conclusion that they aren't focused on the main issues in Uganda, and aren't providing much relief for the country or its citizens. The people of Uganda are currently struggling with spreading disease, an unstable government, and many citizens who aren't specialized in any field of work.

I believe IC is working for good reasons and could be helpful if Kony was the main problem, but as far as contributing to helping Uganda's actual issues, I would consider supporting a different organization that may be more beneficial to helping with their current issues. A common misconception is that IC spends too much on salaries and videos, when in reality And they are doing a phenomenal job.

If you are looking for a traditional nonprofit, then IC is not for you. They are pioneers in using social networking for social change of this scale, and while they have lots of room for improvement, I firmly believe they are worth our support.

Many people, myself included, have based their idea of IC solely on the "Kony " film. However, by only looking at the film, you get only a narrow understanding of the organization. Yes, the film skims over some details; yes, IC is not financially perfect; and yes, they were clearly underprepared for all of this attention.

But, none of this lessens the fact that they are working towards doing something good. Not to mention that they have done a more than adequate job answering their critics, both through a section on their website devoted to answering criticisms to the release of a new film, which openly acknowledges many of their shortcomings. This shows some serious maturity and growth in a young organization, that has already made a huge impact.

I am strongly considering supporting IC, and encourage others to get the whole picture of them before joining the "Kony " critics. Though the intentions seem genuine, Jason Russell and the Invisible Children charity fail to get past the basics.

Another problem with Invisible Children is that this campaign promotes slacktivism and laziness among the country. I sincerely wanted to believe that Kony executed everything perfectly; however, there were too many unaddressed flaws. Therefore, I would personally discourage anyone from investing in this campaign and charity. I feel as if the invisible children have their ups and downs they were once in my eyes a good organization by having there videos post and showing what their plans where for the future.

But after going through the other views and going on different websites like the Better Business Burial BBB they haven't registered their organization with them. Which in mind it makes me feel as a person who would be looking to donate more skeptical about donating to the Invisible Children because if your going to have an organization at least make it legal by registering through the BBB.

If not then it makes me feel as if your trying to scam me, and others. I myself was at first skeptical of the way they spent their donation money. However, after further research into their finances, I have found that IC is a pretty good non-profit organization when it comes to financial responsibility. IC is transparent with finances because they display all tax forms and annual financial reports from the last five years. Overall, Invisible Children is not perfect, but they are pretty responsible with their finances.

I would strongly consider supporting them. People think Invisible Children don't help Uganda and expend to much money in the own video. I agree that they expend too much money in the video. But, they still support Ugandan education. I n the past, men in Uganda have had more education than women. Invisible Children expends money to help men and women in Uganda to finish their education.

For Invisible Children women and men was the same. In October for this year Invisible Children a scholarships to college for Ugandan. I complete support Invisible Children and I encourage you to do the same. One of the most common critiques I have seen of Invisible Children is their financial responsibility.

After doing research through articles about what a financially responsible nonprofit organization looks like as well as accounts such as former workers with Invisible Children, I discovered that this organization is much more financially responsible than I had once believed. What most people do not see is that Invisible Children uses many different methods to achieve their goals including doing tours to raise awareness, producing a warning signal over the radio to prevent LRA kidnappings, and providing various recovery programs.

After doing extensive research, my views on Invisible Children have significantly changed and I am considering volunteering and possibly donating to Invisible Children. I have known IC since when I moved to Uganda. I have see several weaknesses in the organization: 1. They have bought the Uganda govt line about the conflict totally. There is blood on the hands on both sides and to side with the govt in this conflict puts IC in bad company. They spend a lot of their money on salaries in the US and not directly helping the people of Central Africa.

They send naive young people to Uganda for short stints to "do good". Having lived in other cultures for many years I know that it takes at least 6 months just to begin to get a feel for the culture--at which time these young people come back to the US as "experts. They advocate a military solution to the conflict with the LRA ignoring the fact that there are religious leaders in Uganda who have been working to establish dialogue between the Uganda govt and the LRA.

IC should be pressuring the Uganda govt to talk instead or just listening to one side of the issue--again blood on everyone's hands. The military option will only succeed in killing the children who had been abducted. This is a very short-sighted approach. Invisible Children has been criticized through its viral campaigning video, Kony , as cheating and deceiving the public and donators out of their money. This seems reasonable that they spent money where intended, however, "[Their] game isn't who [ Untrustworthy and intentionally deceitful.

They say it was an emotional breakdown. Carmen T. I have been a donor for invisible Children since I did not receive my KONY kit when the video went viral, but I was called by a staff member after the fact Here's why, and I must warn you in advance Since , I have been fully aware of this organization's integrity and willingness to create peace to part of our world.

Before, I never donated. I just watched their films, was shocked as I heard about an ongoing war that was not being covered anywhere in U. I began writing research papers for school peer reviewed searches verified the crisis in dozens of articles , and I began spreading awareness. I attended their Dallas "Rescue Joseph Kony's Child Soldiers" event, where hundreds of us symbolically abducted ourselves and walked 7 miles to a park LRA camp and waited to be rescued by a political figure, someone from the media, and a celebrity.

I wrote letters many letters that day to members of Congress and political leaders, which led to a movement that got President Obama's attention. If you google search photos of Obama signing this act, you can see Laren Poole standing behind him in the oval office. In , after 11 years of advocacy and awareness campaigns that brought the LRA crisis to the attention of the world and its leaders, Invisible Children was restructured to focus more intensively on our programs in the border region of the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and South Sudan, where multiple armed groups like the LRA continue to operate with impunity.

The area is particularly prone to violence because of its severe isolation and lack of governance. Our commitment to our founding mission remains as strong as ever. We work with central African communities directly affected by armed group violence to develop locally-led violence prevention strategies, reunite families affected by conflict, and provide world-class conflict analysis.