What is the difference between ethnocentrism and acculturation

The disparity between these cultures created certain links that brought each closer to one another. In this connection, the uniqueness of one culture as compared to another helps determine the type of interaction made between two or more dissimilar cultures. Depending on the level of respect and sensitivity that one cultural group has to another, the interaction is either good the relativistic view or bad the ethnocentric view.

Cultural relativism seems to be the other side of ethnocentrism. If the former is the brighter end, the latter is considered to be its dark side. If another culture recognizes obese people as beautiful, then you must regard these people as beautiful, most especially if you are with them or if you are currently staying with them. It is the perception that if another group is doing a practice that seems to be contrary to your cultural norms, you then regard that practice immediately to be wrong.

Just because a person is doing an activity that is not acceptable in your culture does not give you the right to regard it as abnormal. Cultural relativism tries to counter ethnocentrism by promoting the understanding of cultural practices that are unfamiliar to other cultures such as eating insects, genocides or genital cutting. Take for example, the common practice of same-sex friends in India walking in public while holding hands.

This is a common behavior and a sign of connectedness between two people. In England, by contrast, holding hands is largely limited to romantically involved couples, and often suggests a sexual relationship. These are simply two different ways of understanding the meaning of holding hands. Someone who does not take a relativistic view might be tempted to see their own understanding of this behavior as superior and, perhaps, the foreign practice as being immoral. Scopetta, William Kurtines, and J.

Perry M. Carl L. Padilla, Kathryn J. Forgas and J. Michael Innes, eds. Terence P. Amado M. Padilla, Yuria Wagatsuma, and Kathryn J. Vega, Andres G. Gil, George J. Warheit, Rick S. Shirley Feldman and Doreen A. Andres G. Gil and William A. John U. Jean L. Athey and Frederick L. Ahearn and Jean L. Athey, eds. Pynoos, eds. Kenji Ima and Ruben G. Guy J. Manaster, Jason C. Elizabeth P. View the child as an individual, not as a member of a cultural group. Ethnocentric individuals judge other groups relative to their own ethnic group or culture, especially with concern for language, behavior, customs, and religion.

There are three main stages of ethnocentrism: 1 denial individual experience ; 2 defence now there are able to recognize that the difference between cultures, but in a way, they protect their own interest ; 3 minimization we are all a human, everyone its same, like me.

Ethno relativism states that no one culture it is superior to another recognize differences between cultures, and believe in adapted and accommodate. Ethno relativism is a belief based on deep and heart-felt respect for other cultures that all groups, cultures, or subcultures are inherently equal. Other cultures have be seen neither as better or worse, but as equally valid but different and complex worldviews.

Ethno relativism divided in three stages: Acceptance grasping the importance of cultural difference, a new way of seeing the world. People accept the existence of other cultural contexts and think this way because they have a more tolerant and sympathetic attitude towards differences.

Adaptation intercultural empathy, interpret and evaluate from more than one cultural perspective, a new way of acting encouraging intensive exploration and research, one expands own worldview to accurately understand other cultures and behave in a variety of culturally appropriate ways Integration more desirable stage than adaptation, define as acculturation or assimilation of culture. Ethnocentrism and ethno relativism are a measure of how much and how well we relate to others.